Pauper Letters
Workhouse inmates and others on the receiving end of the poor relief system are often viewed as being purely passive participants in the proceedings. However, there is considerable evidence that this was not the case. Paupers who felt aggrieved by the treatment they received could be very active in making complaints.
In recent years, research in this area has uncovered the existence of large numbers of letters written by paupers, or by others on their behalf, stating their grievances. A major repository containing many such letters is Britain's National Archives (nationalarchives.gov.uk). One of its major collections (MH12) is the files of correspondence between each union and the central Poor Law authorities: The Poor Law Commissioners (1834-47), the Poor Law Board (1847-71), the Local Government Board (1871-1919), and then the Ministry of Health). Many pauper letters were directed to the central authority of the time and the original letter plus any subsequent follow-up are files in the correspondence files for the particular union involved.
A typical pauper letter (MH 12/14019/195) is one sent to the Poor Law Board in April 1848 by Thomas Hartley, an inmate of the Kidderminster Union workhouse in Worcestershire. Hartley’s complaints covered the infrequent washing of inmates’ stockings, favouritism in the provision of tea and butter to the elderly, the incorrect classification of disabled elderly men as able-bodied, the sending of an 80-year-old man to work in the stone yard, and the housing of ‘idiots’ in subterranean accommodation. Spellings in the transcription below are as in the original.
Kidderminster Union
Apl 17th 1848
Gentlemen, I make my address to you being an inmate of the above mentioned Union which statement is as follows, 1st several weeks ago I made a complaint to the Governer about wearing my stockings 3 weeks without Washing some time after I wrote to the Bord of Gardians stateing the above with other representations, also I told them I was ready to answer them any Questions they Chus’d to put to me, they have put none at all to me, it lies quite dark to me that some has wore stockings 2 months without washing but since my letter to the Gardians some little alterations have been made but our stockings are not changed yet Weekly, 2nd Concerning men 60 years of age & upwards to get Tea & Butter if thought requisite, there are men at 80 who wish for it do not get, plainly speaking it should be if thought favourites, 3rd Men above 60 years of age Ruptured, to hard labour by breaking of stones, according to a piece of a report I have picked who were falsely return’d, Disabled then were return’s able Boddyed it may be the case now, 4th Concerning an Old man which is 80 years of age or upwards forc’d to the stone some times carried upon a mans back some times Weeld down in a Weelbarrow look at this iniquity if I let this pass in silence should I be any then a Cristian, 5th Sick men mixt among well, 6th Idiots in places below the earth I have enough to inform you gentlemen that place wants much investigation, I wish an inquiry before I procede father. I conclude for the Present yours Respectfully Thomas Hartley an inmate of Kidderminster Union
Hartley’s letter is annotated by comments from John Thomas Graves, the Poor Law Inspector responsible for Kidderminster, saying that he will visit Kidderminster and inquire into the complaints. He also notes that that ‘there has long been discontent in this workhouse.’ However, a separate unsigned internal memo (in a different hand) contends that since most of the many such complaints were proven to lack foundation, they should not be acknowledged as this only encouraged the senders. Graves clearly did pursue the matter as revealed by a subsequent letter from Hartley who (confirming the memo-writer’s prediction) expanded upon his grievances at length. Hartley’s new missive concluded with the suggestion that only a surprise visit by the authorities would reveal the true state of affairs at the workhouse since any prior warning resulted in a rapid cleaning-up exercise.
Paupers also sent letters to newspapers to publicise their complaints. In 1862, an inmate of the Newington workhouse, wrote the following letter to London's Weekly Dispatch newspaper, which withheld the author's name:
Upon the admission of a person into this house he is placed in the receiving ward till inspected by the medical officer, and then previous to putting on the house clothes he is bathed; but, Sir, you will be surprised when we tell you that by order of the master, no matter how many are in the receiving ward, they are all bathed in the same water, one after another, dirty or clean. And this to a clean person is most disgusting; And woe to the poor unfortunate who enters this house infected with the itch. He is placed in a ward in beds so dirty and between blankets so thick with the ointment with which they are rubbed, that, to use the words of one ex-wardsman, they are so thick and matted together with grease that it was as much as he could do to separate them, and during this winter the accommodation has been so scanty that two men in a state of nudity have been placed in the same bed together; and to show further how cleanliness is studied in this house only three towels per week are allowed for about 150 men to dry upon, therefore it is not to be wondered at that we can pick vermin off them, which we often do, and the wash house is only open about 10 minutes each morning, and in fact no clean person washes himself in the wash-house but on a Sunday morning, when he can use his dirty shirt in the place of the towels to dry himself. But, Sir, the worst of all is the accommodation provided for the sick. For the inmates and the out-door poor there are only about 40 beds, and at the present time we have men lying about in the damp day halls because there is no room for them in the sick wards, and it is only a few nights since one of the inmates was taken ill during the night the attention of the nurse was called to him and she ordered him into the sick ward, and to make room for him a poor old man, 70 years of age, was turned out of his warm bed and hurried across two cold yards into the body of the house, in order that attention might be paid to the man suddenly taken ill, and I leave it to your readers to judge what the effect of this might be upon an old man at this inclement season of the year. Many of our men are suffering from rheumatics, bad legs and bronchitis, are confined in a damp shed used for chopping firewood This place is built upon the edge of a ditch at the back of the Albany-Road and the fearfully damp state is shown by the rust on the choppers in the morning after their use the previous day. It has no flooring but the damp earth 18 inches below the level of the yard and the men are locked in this place daily. So fearfully cold is it in the winter that the men are cramped and almost perish; and in the summer, what with the smell from the ditch outside and the privy in, it is a wonder that some infection has not broken out over this, but this being within the gates, the attention of the sanitary officer is never called to it. Again, Sir, upon the death of every person four young men are selected to bring down the carpet, and to their disgust they have to put the body in the coffin almost in a state of nudity, except a bit of calico about 4 feet long and 12 or 13 inches wide which is put over the front of the body, which often gets displaced in shifting it from the bed to the coffin, so that the whole person of the corpse, male of female, is exposed to view, no matter of what disease they die. And, in order that we may be made to feel where we are, the master has threatened everyone found smoking in any place in the building to punish them, and it is too cold this weather for old men to smoke in the yard, this being the only comfort we poor creatures have here and we little thought in our days of prosperity, when we paid rates, that we should ever be subject to such treatment in our old days, our only crime being poverty; and there is no wonder that many prefer a prison to such a place as this.
Bibliography
- Steven King, Paul Carter, Natalie Carter, Peter Jones, and Carol Beardmore (2022) In Their Own Write: Contesting the New Poor Law 1834–1900 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press)
- Thomas Sokoll (ed.) (2006) Essex Pauper Letters, 1731-1837
Links
- Voices of the Victorian Poor database.
- University of Leicester In Their Own Write project.
- National Archives Workhoices Voices page
Unless otherwise indicated, this page () is copyright Peter Higginbotham. Contents may not be reproduced without permission.


